OPTION C

Considerations for the future EA Board

Proposing party: Equestrian Australia Dressage Committee

PROVIDE FEEDBACK

Your constructive and considered feedback is encouraged. Note that feedback that is offensive, abusive, or anonymously posted will not be tolerated. You may not agree with the views or opinions of others, but they must be respected.

To add your feedback, you will need to create an account.

4 Comments

  1. How will the Board be appointed in this model?I would suggest direct member voting.

  2. I think there are many good points to take from this, but feels very incomplete. Shell of a model, not yet a model.

  3. Love the idea of the ‘Vested Interest’ test – all for it!
    I don’t understand the role really in the State committees if you’ve got a National discipline body (which is great) – why wouldn’t the clubs deal directly with the national body and reduce administration costs.
    This model needs more work to complete and define a robust solution. It needs to be more radical away from the current state based scenario if it’s moving to national discipline base (let’s hope).

  4. Thank you for preparing your proposal. I agree, there is a need for a dispute tribunal at national level but feel it should be a feeder from a state-based tribunal, members should have to agree that any issue directed to the national dispute tribunal on their behalf will be the final decision. Board appointments: I think it will be a challenge to eliminate anyone with a vested interest, does that mean that every member has to be independent? This is not likely to take into account the unique needs of an equestrian organisation. Are we planning to award director fees? I think it unlikely we could attract enough board candidates with the appropriate skills who were prepared to commit the time required (in term length and in day-to-day requirements) if this was the case; I think we would have a continual stream of short-term applicants. It is essential that the athlete representative position be reinstated.

Submit a Comment

User Guidelines for the Site

Purpose

The intention of the Site is to provide an avenue for stakeholders of EA to have open, constructive, and respectful discussions on the EA restructuring options and process. The behaviour of users must always align with this intention.

Terms

The following terms and conditions govern your use of the EA Engage website, and by accessing EA Engage, you agree to accept and be bound by the terms in full.

While we take all reasonable care in preparing, maintaining, and updating the information on EA Engage, we do not represent or warrant (either express or implied) the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the content. You acknowledge and accept the website content may contain errors.

Users of EA Engage must abide by EA’s social media and code of conduct policies, and must have read these prior to participating in any forum on EA Engage:

Any activity concerning your access to and use of the https://engage.equestrian.org.au/ website as well as any other media form, media channel, mobile website or mobile application related, linked, or otherwise connected thereto (collectively, ‘the Site’) may be considered by EA and disciplinary measures may be taken.

We advise that all content posted on the Site is moderated after the fact and EA reserves its rights to remove content that does not abide by EA’s policies at its entire discretion.

Any content posted on the Site should not be constituted as expressing the views or opinions of EA, the Administrators of EA or KordaMentha. Any content that does not abide by EA’s policies, such as harassment, defamation or bullying should immediately be reported to the Administrators by email: [email protected].

To the maximum extent permitted by law, we disclaim all liability (direct, indirect or consequential loss) for loss directly or indirectly arising from your use of, or reliance on, the website or its content.